No library card needed

“Reading is Fundamental.”

For those of us of a certain age, that slogan brings back childhood memories of weekend educational TV and the public service announcement that routinely reminded us of the value of books and the importance of reading.

Educational experts knew that many children lived in homes without books or regular access to them. And though the slogan and the nonprofit organization of the same name came to be in 1966, its mission is just as important and relevant today as it was then.

While school systems and public libraries have taken on much of the responsibility of making sure toddlers, children and teens have access to books, many private nonprofits have taken on the mission as well. Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library has been in the news quite a bit since her death and for good reason — more than 300 million free books have been distributed to children all over the world through its efforts.

Another successful movement involves small box libraries — usually simple wooden or plastic containers perched atop posts that are filled with free books provided by each site’s steward and other volunteer donors. Inspired by the Little Free Library organization, these miniature libraries have popped up in private yards, public parks, church yards and other neighborhood-oriented spaces across the country.

As a prime local example, I point you to what I consider the penthouse of little libraries — The Library on Searles in Dundalk. What started as a small, one-box repository on a post at the edge of stewardess Sara’s Searles Road front yard has morphed into a three-room mansion, complete with an attached trinket “garage.” That’s impressive growth for the little library that made its debut just four months ago.

The newly renovated Library on Searles.
Photo: Library on Searles Facebook page

The original box was adequate until it wasn’t, Sara told me in a recent phone interview. The box held quite a few books, but there wasn’t a sense of organization. All sorts of books were stuffed on the shelves and folks had to dig through all the titles to find something they were interested in, she said.

“Through growth and traction as more people found us, I discovered it was tough for people digging through, looking for age-appropriate books,” she said. “And teens would come and say, ‘There’s nothing here for us,’ and I felt bad.”

She realized she had many offerings for young children and adults, but the selection for teens was indeed lacking. That thought gave her the idea to redesign and rebuild the library, with different “rooms” for different age groups. The resulting “penthouse” has individual boxes for children, teens and adults, with a smaller attached cabinet for little trinkets, stickers and toys. To complete the philosophy of inclusiveness, a water bowl for four-legged visitors sits at the base.

Sara started the little library almost as a necessity, she said. The mother of two who is admittedly a voracious reader, realized her own collection was getting out of control and could stand to be pruned a bit.

“I didn’t want to sell them and I didn’t want to donate them to an organization that would sell them for profit,” she said of her surplus books. “I’d much rather give them away.”

And so the Library on Searles was born. The first iteration was a kit from Amazon that she bought and assembled. For the upgrade, her husband Josh build a new base and Sara assembled and attached the additional boxes.

“The hardest part was probably getting it level and solid,” she said with a laugh. “If there was the slightest lean forward, the books would fall out when the door was opened.”

The renovated library seems to be working well, she said. She estimates the entire unit can hold well over one hundred books and maybe more, given the thinness of many children’s books and graphic novels.

The Library on Searles has developed quite a following, thanks in part to a well-maintained social media presence. Sara devotes considerable time to her pet project, she admitted. She starts each day with a morning visit to the library to unlock it (it gets locked up each night). She straightens and organizes, and adds books if needed. She keeps folks up to date with regular posts on Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.

Just this week, Sara received an email from Little Free Library informing her that her labor of love has been showered with love of its own. The LFL app had more than 425,000 users in 2025, according to the email. The missive shared a list of the "10 most-favorited book-sharing boxes of the last 30 days" and the Searles Road unit was fifth on the national list that includes libraries in Utah, New York, Texas, California and Florida.

Sara said she routinely gets notes and online comments thanking her for her efforts, which means a lot, she said. She and her husband have made a considerable financial investment in the project, in addition to their time and personal in-kind donations.

"It feels good to know it's appreciated and it fills a need," Sara said. 

She celebrated the renovations with online announcements and is currently running a giveaway contest with a basket of donated goodies going to the winner. Details are available on the Library of Searles Facebook page. She routinely posts photos of the library and the nearby drop box, and she introduced herself by way of a video.

A dropbox for donations sits near the library to make it easy for folks to leave books and items for the trinket box. Sara spends considerable time on donated items, making sure all books are in good condition and do not have any mold or mildew.

“I also freeze all donated books to make sure any bugs that might be present are killed,” she said. “I have one whole freezer that has nothing but books in it.”

She laughed as she said her husband is less than thrilled about an entire freezer being devoted to books but said he whole-heartedly supports the effort.

Drop box at the Library on Searles.
Photo: Facebook

The little library, though just four months old, is steeped in history and stands as a monument to the legacy of her grandparents, who previously owned the home that they bought new in the 1950s.

“My Grandpa worked at Bethlehem Steel and always believed in being involved in the community,” Sara said. “He grew tomatoes and was known for giving them to the neighbors. And my grandmother watched kids for other people so they could go to work. The two of them would do anything they could for others.”

Sara spent considerable time in the home when she was growing up, and then became a neighbor when Sara’s mother bought the house next door. After the death of her grandparents, she jumped on the opportunity to buy it.

“They loved living here and so do I,” Sara said. “They always emphasized serving the community and I wish they were here to see the sense of community this is creating. They would love it.”

If You Go:

Library on Searles, 2355 Searles Road, Dundalk, MD 21222

Please be respectful of the library and area neighbors!

To Donate:

Donations of books and small toys and item for the trinket box are appreciated. A drop box is adjacent to the library.

Follow on Social:

Facebook: Library on Searles

Instagram: libraryonsearles

TikTok: libraryonsearles

Get out your decoder rings!

I read with great pleasure a recent Baltimore Banner article about the rebirth of cursive writing instruction in several local school systems.

Across the nation, cursive instruction was sacrificed, beginning around 2010, as Common Core curriculum standards were implemented.The purpose of Common Core was to standardize instruction so a fourth-grader in California was learning the same content at the same pace as fourth-graders in Texas or Alabama or Maine. According to theory, a child whose family moved across the country could be seamlessly plunked down in a new school and pick up right where she left off at her old school.

But somewhere along the line, with a school day packed full of required academic elements to satisfy those new standards, cursive writing was kicked out of many school districts.

I remember being sad for future generations when cursive disappeared. I was the education reporter for a daily newspaper when Common Core was implemented, so I followed it closely as it pertained to the local school system. 

My memories of my earliest cursive instruction are wonderful. One of the most exciting things about entering second grade was the knowledge that cursive writing was on the agenda. I had a terrific teacher that year — Miss Anna Nistico at Mars Estates Elementary — and she was both talented and patient as she led her latest group of 7-year-olds through the loops and curly-Qs and tails of cursive. We first learned each individual letter of the alphabet, filling entire sheets of paper with just one letter, carefully practiced over and over again. After we mastered the entire alphabet, we learned how to loop those individual letters together to form words.

We wrote on rough, rather pulpy, lumpy light beige, almost gray paper that had two solid lines split in half with a dotted line, which created one lane for writing. The guides were there to show sizing for upper and lower case letters. Because the paper quality wasn’t great, the over-zealous erasing by inexperienced pencil-holders could result in a hole. To that end, Miss Nistico had a few rules: If we made a mistake, we were not to erase, attempt to write over the error or scribble it out. We were to draw a single line through our mistake and move on.

It was a wonderful day when a paper came back with a gold star or when extra careful penmanship elicited a compliment from the teacher we all adored.

I am more than 60 years removed from that classroom, and can still smell that paper, still feel the awkwardness of the fat pencils we used, and still revel in the thrill of mastering a new letter as we progressed through the alphabet.

Over the remaining years of public school, I took great pride in having good handwriting and worked to develop my own style. In high school, I dropped a lot of the curly-Qs on some upper case letters and I customized my lower case Rs because I was never happy with my rendition of the formal, “approved” style.

In college, for speed purposes, I developed a hybrid style of cursive/manuscript for note-taking but always used my formal style for assignments to be turned in.

I have always loved doodling and never met a pen I didn’t like. Somewhere along the line, I bought an instructional book and specialized pens and taught myself calligraphy. Today, most of my handwriting is confined to mailing cards and making lists but I still love the physical act of writing.  And I’m convinced my penmanship is terrific with certain pens and crappy with others, although I also admit that a 20-year journalism career destroyed my handwriting.

So it is those fond 60-year-old memories that made me sad when I heard that most schools had eliminated cursive, and made me happy to know that, as I witness the resurgence of what I consider an art form, future generations will build those same memories.

According to the Banner article, Baltimore and Harford counties are both reintroducing cursive to all second- and third-grade classes. Baltimore County’s move follows its pilot program held last year at 24 schools.

“Educators and researchers who embrace cursive say the skill can help students’ motor skills, improve their writing’s legibility and even help them better retain what they’re learning,” the article by reporter Kristin Griffith stated.

Much has been made in recent years — perhaps decades now — of the perceived inability of youngsters to communicate verbally or in written form because of the increased time spent on screens and the impersonal, casual, abbreviation-laden communication of text messages, email and social media. I personally have worked with younger colleagues who would rather die than pick up a phone and talk to someone in person. They depended on email before texting was prevalent, and I would imagine the ubiquitous presence of smart phones has exasperated that situation. Couple that with folks who can’t write in a fast, efficient manner and you have a communications disaster waiting to happen. It’s more bizarre when communicating is the job.

So this doodler is very happy that cursive is making a comeback and I hope there are many gold stars in the future for this year’s second-graders.

Thanks for reading and feel free to critique my handwriting!

Not in this lifetime

I collect coins. I'm not an expert, I’m not particularly knowledgeable, and I don't own anything rare or especially valuable, with the single exception of a platinum coin I bought because it honors the free press rights provided by the First Amendment. I have mostly common coins, and I enjoy filling coin folders with complete collections — or as complete as possible.

I buy a lot of uncirculated (which denotes a more pristine condition) coins from the U.S. Mint, including dollar coins and Kennedy half-dollars, which stopped being put into circulation some years ago.

The Semi-Q half-dollar, dubbed Enduring Liberty.
Photo: Marge Neal

Emerging Liberty, the newly redesigned Semi-Q dime.
Photo: Marge Neal

The mint has announced the Sept. 2 release date of a $1 coin bearing the image of the sitting president. It is being marketed as an issue in the series of special semiquincentennial coins being minted just for this calendar year. The series includes a completely redesigned dime, a collection of five different quarters, and a newly designed half-dollar. While the nickel was not redesigned, it will bear the double date of 1776-2026 (as do the other coins mentioned).

Back and front of the Mayflower Compact quarter,
the first of five Semi-Q quarters to be issued this year.
Photo: Marge Neal

These coins have been tough to come by, both through the mint and from banks or in consumer change. For some reason, the mint chose to put a low limit on the number of rolls and bags sold online, and as a result, each product sells out within 10 minutes of being offered. And I haven't found any banks yet that have ordered any of the circulating coins.

Most coin collectors will tell you the hunt is a huge part of the attraction.

That said, this new dollar coin will not be brought into my home and the semiquincentennial coin folder will forever have an empty space in it.

Bullion Sharks is offering a $25 roll of coins for $69, while the U.S. Mint is charging a mere $61.

The only good thing about this coin is that all of these dollar coins have been failures in terms of popularity. Folks never warmed up to carrying them and, as a result, Federal Reserve vaults across the country are stuffed to the rafters with pallets and pallets of bags of dollar coins.

In spite of the unpopularity of these coins, the mint continues to spit them out at an alarming rate. There was a 10-year series of coins honoring all deceased presidents. Two years after George H.W. Bush’s death, his coin was minted and the coin honoring Jimmy Carter should be coming soon. (The law that created the presidents series said no living former or current president could be on a coin, and that coins for recently deceased presidents could be issued only after a two-year waiting period). 

The Native American/Sacajawea dollar coins have been minted since 2000. And now, we are in the midst of the 15-year series honoring the innovations of all 50 states plus territories.

The coins are being minted just for collectors and not for general circulation, though there are those of us who buy them from the mint and then spread them around. These coins are not commemorative coins. They are legal tender worth exactly one dollar each and can be spent accordingly. I always enjoyed leaving a new issue or two with a tip when I visited a pub or restaurant.

The latest Innovations dollar coins touts Minnesota's invention of mobile refrigeration.
Photo: Marge Neal

I give you that background so you and I can take pleasure in knowing the bulk of these DT coins — made possible by a specifically written bill that allowed the sitting president's image to be put on a coin as long as it honored the nation's 250th birthday — will languish unused and unadmired in cold, dark vaults until perhaps the day comes when they get destroyed.

In the mean time, keep your eyes peeled for the Semi-Q coins designed to hit banks and cash registers near you! Take a closer look at your nickels, dimes and quarters if you want to start your own collection.

Same old same old

I’ve decided it’s past time I admit — nay declare — that the Baltimore Orioles will never be anything other than a mediocre baseball team.

I’ve been wanting to say that for several years now, but I deferred to much more learned folks — the historians and archivists, the statisticians, the algorithm drones, the believers of “the rebuild,” the optimists — who convinced me otherwise. Or at least convinced me to keep my mouth shut.

Facebook image

Realizing that my personal conclusion is derived mainly from emotional and anecdotal evidence, I acquiesced to the “experts” and rode out several more seasons, witnessing little to nothing to change my mind.

Watching the recent trade of Adley Rutschman finally put me over the edge and I’ll tell you why.

Since 2018, we have been told to put all our faith in the rebuild of all rebuilds. In July of that year, the Orioles traded star third baseman Manny Machado (still a kid himself) to the Dodgers in exchange for a gaggle of prospects. Many of us believed Machado would be the center piece of a rebuild. That move kicked off a subsequent fire sale of most veteran players that we were told was the official beginning of a ground-up renovation. In November, the team hired Mike Elias as executive vice president and general manager. Fans were told Elias would craft a structural rebuild much in the fashion of the one he was credited with engineering for the Houston Astros. Elias worked for the Astros from 2012-2018, and was widely credited with drafting core talent that turned the basement dwellers into World Series champions.

Elias was known for his dependence on and faith in analytics, and brought several Houston analytical employees with him, saying that he would implement a data-driven organizational overhaul.

In December 2018, Elias hired Brandon Hyde, a Chicago Cubs bench coach, to be the team’s manager, the guy who would lead the rebuild.

But here’s the problem I have, as a 60-year fan of this team. Since the mid-1980s, not long after the Orioles’ most recent World Series championship, we the fans have been sold on rebuild after rebuild after rebuild, though admittedly of various levels of destruction and reconstruction.

There have been a few high spots along the way. Camden Yards opened in 1992 and fans flocked to the new stadium in record numbers. Corporations snapped up season tickets by the bucketful and the team set a franchise record for the most consecutive sellouts. At one time, the season ticket waiting list was estimated to be about 10 years.

The team made the playoffs in 1996 and ’97 but didn’t go far.

“However, the late 1990s and early 2000s were characterized by losing seasons and rebuilding efforts,” according to an online history of the team.

The team had a bit of resurgence under the field leadership of manager Buck Showalter, with the O's making the playoffs in 2012, ’14 and ’16. Then the bottom fell out, leading to the team finishing last in the AL East in 2017, 18 games behind the division champs Boston Red Sox. And no fan can forget the catastrophic season of 2018, which saw the team set a franchise record no one wants to set, with a record of 47 wins and 115 losses. Showalter was fired three days after that abysmal season ended.

Over these many years, we have watched young players come and go as soon as their rookie contracts expired. We watched pitchers struggle here and then watched them win World Series titles, Cy Young awards and MVP accolades when they went elsewhere. 

So, with that history, I give you some of my emotional thoughts. In saying the Orioles will remain mired in mediocrity, I fully realize there will be the fluke years, the surprise years and the over-achievement years. But while I probably won’t be alive to say “I told you so,” I doubt we will ever see our Birds experience the dominance and success of the 1960s, ‘70s and early-80s. From elementary school through college, my favorite baseball team was almost always in the running. And the team remained consistent and recognizable — the days of Brooks, Boog, Frank and Jim to later days of Cal, Eddie, Rick and Mike.

Maybe I have a memory of convenience, but I don’t remember many examples of young stars or beloved veterans being sold off mid-season. 

Now, I can practically hear some of you ‘splaining to me that baseball is a business. I know that and understand that. I just don’t think Baltimore owners since the departure of Jerry Hoffberger have been particularly good at running the business. Ownership went from bad to worse when it transitioned from Edward Bennet Williams to Eli Jacobs, and then to Peter Angelos. And like it or not, the fan base is an important part of that business equation but they never seem to have a seat at the table.

Again, anecdotally, I blame the 31-year tenure of the Angelos regime for establishing the draft them and ditch them philosophy of player retainment. For decades, we have all witnessed the pattern of drafting good, young players year after year. We watch them develop and we fall in love with them, only to see them either traded off before their rookie contracts end or lost to free agency. The Orioles, it appears, are happy to have three or four years of baseball minimum-wage players and then get rid of them when it’s time to pay them market value.

Which brings me to the current “rebuild.” According to the calendar, we’re in year eight of the rebuild that kicked off officially with the 2019 season. By virtue of finishing poorly year after year, the Orioles were able to stock the minor leagues with top prospects with the high draft picks awarded to crappy teams.

For several years during this current rebuild, we took pride in having the highest rated farm system, which was chock full of promising, almost guaranteed future stars. At one point, the farm system was so bloated we bragged about the embarrassment of riches, with the only worry being how all of them would get appropriate playing time and how to choose among them when the time came.

For the first time, many of us actually followed the progress of minor leaguers as they made their way through the farm team ranks. We know the names — Rutschman, Henderson, Holliday, Hall, Cowser, Westburg, Stowers, Mayo, Kjerstad, Beavers, Norby and Ortiz.

We kept an eye on those young guns because they were the seeds of the next World Series, we were told. And indeed, when Adley Rutschman was promoted mid-season 2022, he was largely credited with being the shot in the arm that turned that season around. Adley was the fresh face of the rebuild and would be followed by the rest of the young phenoms as they paid their minor league dues. And one after the other, most of them were called up. Some went up and down as their performances waxed and waned but the future was here, we were told.

In that 2022 season, after Elias traded away veteran players at the deadline, he declared, “It’s liftoff from here.” Translation: The rebuild was complete and the pieces were in place for longterm success.

We played along with the narrative. We embraced these young players with the vibrant personalities and the equally vibrant skill sets. I got a big kick out of the dugout traditions the kids instituted, from the large chain link home run necklace to the homer hose to the hydration station. Sunflower seed showers greeted home run hitters when they returned to the dugout and team chemistry seemed to be at an all-time high. The creation of the Bird Bath section in the stands was pure marketing genius, I thought.

In 2022, Adley’s debut season, the Birds finished with 83 wins and 79 losses. The following year, the Orioles shocked the baseball world by winning the AL East division with a record of 101-61. The post-season excitement was short-lived, however, as the home team lost three straight games to the Texas Rangers in a divisional series. But, we all thought, the long awaited baseball Promised Land was here. There would be more of the same, the team would only get better as more prospects got promoted.

The 2024 season took a little step backward, with a final record of 91-71, good enough for a Wild Card slot in the playoffs. The post-season disappointment continued, however, with the Kansas City Royals sweeping the series, 2 games to none.

The 2025 season took an even bigger step back with a final record of 75-87, finishing outside of playoff borders.

This seems like a good time to point to the elephant in the room — the albatross, the Achille’s heel. Pitching. This team has needed pitching for more than 30 years. Sure, there’s the occasional ace, the surprise performer, the veteran with one final superb season, the great closer. But we haven’t had a solid pitching staff with four good, dependable starters in forever. The days of Palmer, Cuellar, McNally and Dobson are long gone. Hell, the days of complete games are long gone. Pitchers are specialists these days. There are starters; there are openers who will pitch just an inning or two, by design, before yielding to the bullpen; there are long- and middle-relievers; there’s a set-up pitcher; and there’s a closer. Jim Palmer threw 211 complete games in his 19-year tenure. Shane Baz just threw a complete game for the Birds on Friday, a 2-1 loss to Texas.Trevor Rogers tossed a complete game on Aug 1, 2025, and that was the first once since Dean Kremer completed his game of Sept. 23, 2022.

And despite pitchers specializing and throwing far fewer innings than their predecessors, they are experiencing season- and career-ending injuries at alarming rates. Is conditioning a problem? Is technique a problem? Is pitch speed emphasized too much? I don’t know what the cause is, but modern pitching is destroying too many arms.

I’d have to scour rosters but I think the last time we had a true ace who stayed longer than a couple of seasons was Mike Mussina. And our losing culture eventually handed him to the Yankees. I took great pride in watching the Yankees not win a World Series during his tenure, because we Baltimore fans can carry a grudge, but that’s another story.

But I digress. Every year, pitching is the big need. And every year, we go to winter meetings and come out with outfielders we don’t need and utility infielders we don’t need. When we sign a pitcher, it’s usually a veteran whose best years are behind him. We have prospects and has-beens; there don't seem to be many high-performing middle-career players who are here because they want to be. And mid-career players who express a desire to remain an Oriole get traded away.

With pitchers almost an endangered species in Baltimore, we just traded away Dean Kremer and Tyler Wells at the deadline. It sure seems like management has raised the white flag on this season.

So here’s my major beef and the move that I think proves my point that the Orioles will never be a serious contender. 

Just four years ago, Adley Rutschman was the heir apparent — the fresh, enthusiastic face of the most comprehensive overhaul in team history. He was it. He was going to lead us to the Promised Land. He was going to take us deep into the playoffs and eventually to the World Series.

And now he’s gone. Cut loose. Traded for any value at all before he could be lost to free agency; before he could get scarfed up by a team with ultra-deep pockets. Because the Orioles just don’t pay those big contracts with any regularity. And any time they do sign those mega contracts, they get burned (can we say Chris Davis?) and that cools the desire to offer those kinds of deals again.

I’ve read the opinions that we actually got a great deal for Adley, that we got a handful of top prospects. Indeed, the team is once again boasting about the ranking of its farm system, based largely on those new acquisitions. We’re being told they are promises for a bright future. But we’ve been living on the promises of upcoming prospects and an extremely loaded farm system for years, and what do we have to show for it? Two playoff appearances with a collective record of 0-5 is supposed to excite us? We are now watching the big rebuild prospects being traded away. Of the players I mentioned above, Rutschman, Hall, Stowers, Norby and Ortiz are gone. Westburg is injured and out for the season, and Kjerstad is still languishing in the farm system. And Ryan Mountcastle, a highly touted draft pick from before the rebuild, never really lived up to his potential and has spent much of his career on the injured list. Neither Henderson nor Holliday are performing at the levels we were told to expect, which could bring into question the abilities of the coaching staff. It just seems like — and again, anecdotally — too many players aren't developing to the levels they were expected to attain.

In a nutshell, something is horribly, systemically wrong with this team. Elias doesn’t seem to be the right guy for the position that apparently holds much of the sway in creating the team’s blueprint; I’m not at all impressed with rookie manager Craig Albernaz, who seems to be way out of his element; our coaching staff doesn’t seem to be effective or inspirational; and our training and conditioning staff is obviously suspect.

I had high hopes when David Rubenstein bought the team, and he was Mr. Visibility that first year. He was always at games, meandering into seating sections and tossing out team merch. He seemed like a breath of fresh air. Now he just seems like more of the same; the continuation of the draft them and ditch them philosophy.

I’m prepared to lose Henderson, Holliday and the rest of this young cohort over the next few years as they head to wealthy contenders and then we’ll be on to the next group of promising prospects. Wash, rinse, repeat.

The experts, the pundits, the analysts and the statisticians might still believe otherwise.

But this is my story and I’m sticking to it.